<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>What&apos;s new at Google AdWords</title>
        <description>Google AdWords - changes, new options, new features and more. With expert commentary from a Qualified AdWords Professional.</description>
        <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
        <generator>FeedForAll v2.0 (2.0.2.9) http://www.feedforall.com</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Work faster in Google AdWords</title>
            <description>Google are beginning to ask if you want to &quot;Work faster in AdWords&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they mean is that Google Gears will soon be available for Google AdWords users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you find AdWords to sometimes be painfully slow (and who doesn&apos;t?), this could be an interesting development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My initial thought was how well they will handle synchronization of new data. Based on their help article, they claim that this isn&apos;t a problem: &lt;a href=&quot;https://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=168020&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; &gt;Browser Local Storage&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My advice? It&apos;s probably worth holding off on this new feature until it is more widely available. So far, we are only seeing it in a few client accounts. </description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7B036FD2-C964-46B7-98E8-9A5651261535</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lost your filters?</title>
            <description>If you were wondering where AdWords filters, links to show only enabled campaigns and column modifications went, Google have recently moved those items and others into a new toolbar right above the graph within the AdWords web interface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a nice new way to segment data based on day, week, month and so on. Not really a new feature just a more convenient way of accessing this data. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information on this change can be found here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/02/streamlined-analysis-tools-in-your_12.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; &gt;Streamlined analysis tools in your Campaigns tab&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">BA806E3F-C844-4930-BF11-0A5F8C7DBF98</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Targeting mobile devices gets  focused</title>
            <description>If you wish to target mobile devices such as iPhones through AdWords, you&apos;re in luck. Google are now allowing you to specifically target device type and carrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To access this new feature, you need to visit your campaign settings. There you will find it under the &quot;Networks, devices, and extensions&quot; section. Select &quot;Let me choose&quot; next to devices which will then expand a very long list of options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This feature is important to all users of AdWords for the following reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) If you know your target audience will not be arriving from an iPhone, exclude this traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) If you are targeting this audience, for example if you sell software that only works on Palm devices, you can now specifically target them and not iPhones. By the way, where is Blackberry in the list?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, why have Google not done this for desktop computers? It would be remarkably useful to have the ability to target specific users on specific types of computers.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e108</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">BE2E0E4F-20D6-4306-82B2-E0F18A87340C</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bid Simulator</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google recently launched their AdWords bid simulator:<br>
<br>
"<i>Have you ever wondered how many impressions or clicks you could have received if you had used a different maximum CPC bid? Until now, finding the right bid has typically involved a lot of trial and error.<br>
<br>
The bid simulator, launched today, is a feature of the new AdWords interface that shows you the potential impact of your bid on your advertising results. While it can't predict the future, the bid simulator allows you to explore what could have happened if you had set different keyword-level bids.<br>
<br>
Using data from the past seven days, the bid simulator re-calculates the number of impressions for which your ad could have shown had you chosen a different maximum CPC, how many clicks your ad could have gotten for those impressions and how much those clicks could have cost. The feature provides increased transparency into the AdWords auction and gives you the insight to make more informed bidding decisions to meet your advertising objectives.</i>"<br>
<br>
The tool is an interesting idea, and it appears that a number of advertisers are getting quite excited about it.<br>
<br>
However it's worth remembering that there are two ways to rank higher and get more clicks: Spend more money. Or work the system.<br>
<br>
The problem with the new tool is that it will push some advertisers to simply spend more on their bids.<br>
<br>
As an <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/gap.html" target="_blank">AdWords Qualified Company</a>, we know that you really don't need to spend more money to get more targeted traffic from Google.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/08/bid-like-pro-with-bid-simulator.html" target="_blank">Bid like a pro with the bid simulator</a> (Google's title - not mine!)]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e107</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:22:44 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The New AdWords Interface is live - bad news for most advertisers</title>
            <description>The new interface appears to be out of beta.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But it&apos;s not all good news.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Details on our Software Marketing Blog.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://blog.SoftwarePromotions.com/index.php/new-adwords-interface-bad-news-for-most-advertisers-2009-05-14/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New AdWords interface - bad news for most advertisers&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e106</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:44:51 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Conversion Metrics</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Our very own Aaron Weiner has written about some recent changes to Google's conversion tracking in the SoftwarePromotions <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://blog.SoftwarePromotions.com">Software Marketing News blog</a>:<br>
<br>
"<i>If you are using AdWords conversion tracking on your website, you might not have been aware that only one conversion will be counted for a particular visitor. For example, if you have the same conversion tracking code set up on each of your software downloads, you will only see one conversion for a particular visitor, even though they may have downloaded multiple products from your website. This is because a conversion can only be counted once per user.<br>
<br>
So how do you tell if your AdWords traffic is performing a particular action multiple times? In the past, you would need to dig deeper within the AdWords reporting center.<br>
<br>
However Google have now moved this value right into the conversion tracking section of your AdWords account. The new name is called "Conversions (many-per-click)".</i>"<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://blog.SoftwarePromotions.com/index.php/new-adwords-conversion-metrics-conversions-many-per-click-2009-04-14/">New AdWords conversion metrics - Conversions (many-per-click)</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e105</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:10:44 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Warning: New AdWords phishing</title>
            <description>Be careful how you log into your Google AdWords account.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://blog.SoftwarePromotions.com/index.php/warning-new-adwords-phishing-and-the-mysql-saga-2009-03-17/&quot;&gt;Warning: New AdWords phishing and the MySQL saga&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e104</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:01:18 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More display URL policy changes</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Inside AdWords have announced a change to their AdWords policy on display URLs:<br>
<br>
"<i>In an effort to provide more relevant results and a high quality experience for our users, we've made the decision to disallow multiple display URL domains within a single ad group. Going forward, all display URLs within an ad group must have the same top-level domain. Please note that this amendment to our policy applies to all advertisers, regardless of previous exceptions or acceptability of any ad groups.</i>"<br>
<br>
The main point is that the display URLs need to have <b>the same top-level domain</b>.<br>
<br>
Note that sub-domains are allowed, so all of the following would comply with the new policy:<br>
<br>
- www.yoursite.com<br>
- blog.yoursite.com<br>
- www.blog.yoursite.com<br>
<br>
Different display URLs are still allowed, but these have to be placed in their own ad groups.<br>
<br>
Why? I have no idea.<br>
<br>
Google claim that this is "<i>in an effort to provide more relevant results and a high quality experience for our users</i>", but this is clearly nonsense. The user is entirely unaffected by the new policy.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/02/change-to-our-display-url-policy.html" target="_blank">A change to our display URL policy</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e103</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:12:06 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New AdWords interface</title>
            <description>From our Software Marketing News blog:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;&lt;i&gt;Google appear to be working on a fresh new AdWords interface. In short it is very impressive.  For now, not everyone is able to see the new look, as it appears that Google are rolling it out in stages. In fact out of all the clients whose accounts we manage, only one had access to the new interface.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
More details here:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://blog.SoftwarePromotions.com/index.php/new-adwords-interface-very-cool-2009-01-30/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New AdWords interface - very cool!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e102</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:55:47 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Using Trademarked Names in Display URLs</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[PPC Hero have a very interesting article on why trademarked names <b>are allowed</b> in Google's Display URL.<br>
<br>
Yes, I did say that they <b>are </b>allowed.<br>
<br>
According to the article, Google had the following to say:<br>
<br>
"Our trademark policy only applies to the use of the term in the ad text. We don't monitor the display URL and thus we will not disapprove an ad if the trademark term only appears in the URL line."<br>
<br>
Enjoy it while it lasts.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://www.ppchero.com/why-trademarked-names-are-allowed-in-google-display-url/" target="_blank">Why Trademarked Names Are Allowed in Google Display URL</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e101</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:33:16 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Your Google AdWords Approval Status</title>
            <description>&quot;Thank you for advertising with Google AdWords. After reviewing your account, we&apos;ve found that one or more of your ads or keywords does not meet our guidelines. You can see your disapproved ad(s), the reason for disapproval, and editorial suggestions, from the Disapproved Ads page within your account.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You&apos;ve probably seen this sort of email before, but this one isn&apos;t from Google.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A new flavour of AdWords phishing?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://blog.SoftwarePromotions.com/index.php/your-google-adwords-approval-status-2009-01-05/&quot;&gt;Your &quot;Google AdWords&quot; Approval Status&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e100</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:28:36 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Editor 7.0 released</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Version 7.0 of Google's AdWords Editor has just been released.<br>
<br>
This is technically a major release, but in fact there's nothing particularly major or exciting.<br>
<br>
What's new?<br>
<br>
<b>First page bid estimates:</b> I'm no fan of this misleading information, so am less than pleased to see it in AdWords Editor.<br>
<br>
<b>Keyword Quality Score: </b>In the Keywords tab. As I don't display this by default, there's nothing to get my heart racing here either.<br>
<br>
<b>Keyword Opportunities locale:</b> This is a nice addition to the AdWords Editor built-in keyword research tool. <br>
<br>
<b>Send feedback to Google:</b> "Help us improve AdWords Editor by enabling usage tracking in your AdWords Editor settings (Tools menu> Settings). Seriously, you have to admire the genius of Google!<br>
<br>
And other minor updates.<br>
<br>
The bottom line, not much to be excited about here. But it appears to be stable - more so than version 6.5 earlier this year.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?link=http://www.google.com/support/adwordseditor/bin/static.py?page=release_notes.html&hl=en" target="_blank">Google AdWords Editor version 7.0</a><br>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e099</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:56:36 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>iPhones and other mobile devices</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google recently added a new option under campaign settings.<br>
<br>
Under <b>Networks and bidding</b>, there's a section entitled <b>Device Platform</b> that has two options:<br>
<br>
Desktop and laptop computers.<br>
<br>
iPhones and other mobile devices with full Internet browsers.<br>
<br>
Google define full browsers as "those that can show standard HTML web pages and can support a user making a purchase from start to finish, including supporting any tracking or Analytics functionality on e-commerce pages". <br>
<br>
Note that this doesn't include WAP browsers.<br>
<br>
My issue with this new functionality is that it is enabled by default.<br>
<br>
Realistically, how many of your customers are likely to search for your goods via their iPhone?<br>
<br>
Most companies should be able to safely disable this setting.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e098</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:51:44 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Top Tactics for Tough Times</title>
            <description>&quot;Armed with the right advertising strategies, online advertisers can find opportunities in today&apos;s economic downturn. And AdWords&apos; real-time targeting and reporting provide advertisers with the most nimble and efficient way to reach customers during these tight times.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We know you&apos;re probably keeping a close eye on your bottom line, and in this challenging economic climate, we&apos;re committed to helping you maximize your AdWords investment. To that end, we asked experts on the AdWords team to share their top recommendations for getting the most out of AdWords during an economic downturn. &quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/adwords/tactics2008/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Top Tactics for Tough Times &lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e097</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:57:54 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More Quality Score Changes</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google are soon to introduce two new changes to how Quality Score is calculated and ads are displayed.<br>
<br>
<b>The end of the snowball effect:</b><br>
<br>
CTR has obviously been a major part of Quality Score, as the greater the click rate, the more relevant the ads - according to Google.<br>
<br>
The catch has been that higher positions usually generate higher CTRs, due to their prominence and visibility.<br>
<br>
Google are now removing the "influence of ad position on CTR" from the calculation.<br>
<br>
Rather them than me.<br>
<br>
<b>Three can be more than one and more than four:</b><br>
<br>
How many times did you have to read that sentence?<br>
<br>
Google are changing the rules for the ads that appear above the natural search results.<br>
<br>
In the past if the ad with the highest position did not meet the "quality threshold", then no ads were displayed above the search results.<br>
<br>
Now Google will allow ads that meet the "quality threshold" to appear above the search results, even if this means that it has to effectively jump over other ads to do so.<br>
<br>
<br>
The bottom line here is that while these changes are logical, they're going to make tracking and understanding your data more complicated than ever.<br>
<br>
From Google's Inside AdWords:<br>
<br>
"Keep in mind that these enhancements may cause changes to your ad position, spend, and performance. We're launching these updates soon so that you'll have enough time to review your accounts and prepare for your holiday season advertising. While we don't believe that any immediate changes are needed on your part, we encourage you, as always, to watch your key metrics and to make adjustments as appropriate."<br>
<br>
Wise words indeed.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/10/improvements-to-ads-quality.html">Improvements to Ads Quality</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e096</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:47:27 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How will the recession affect Google AdWords?</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The recession is upon us. The credit-crunch has been stinging, the deteriorating exchange rates are good for no-one, and as depressing as it sounds, it's going to get a whole lot worse before it starts to get better.<br>
<br>
Perversely, however, the recession is probably going to be quite good for businesses with a Google AdWords account, assuming they know what they're doing.<br>
<br>
In the struggle between brain and brawn, the past few years have seen Google lean increasingly towards brute strength; companies who achieve high volumes of traffic by paying dearly for it. And those of us who prefer to use more cost-effective methods of skill, experience and technique have often had quite a fight on our hands.<br>
<br>
The recession is set to change this. I predict that as the less-skilled businesses have to start tightening their belts, they won't be anywhere near as eager to recklessly hurl money at their Google AdWords accounts, and may slash their budgets or even stop spending altogether.<br>
<br>
This will result in less competition, more clicks, and should even lower the costs.<br>
<br>
We've already started seeing the beginning of this trend in some of our client's accounts, and I predict that as the economy gets dragged deeper down the toilet, we'll see a lot more.<br>
<br>
There's never been a better time to make sure that your account is in good hands.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e095</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:36:19 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google and Search Partners - the separation begins</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google AdWords have taken the surprising step of providing separate stats for Google, Search partners and the content network.<br>
<br>
You can see the breakdown of this information at the account, campaign and ad group level, so they're clearly eager to make sure you see this data. The question is why?<br>
<br>
A few thoughts:<br>
<br>
<b>Cynical:</b> The more data Google provide, the more likely the advertiser is to drown. Death through data is the norm.<br>
<br>
<b>Practical:</b> There's greater transparency, but no more control. You still can't (yet) set up a Search partners only campaign.<br>
<br>
<b>Optimistic:</b> I can't provide hard/meaningless figures, but am confident that advertising on the Search partners network isn't anywhere near as effective as on Google itself. If budgets are being depleted, then some companies may choose to disable the Search partners. Nothing new here - but now you have the data to hand.<br>
<br>
<b>Impressed (by Google and/or myself): </b>It appears that you can go back and look at old data. Meaning that Google knew this information before but only shared part of the picture. Who would have guessed?<br>
<br>
<b>Puzzled: </b>Why are Google doing this? Are they providing greater transparency? If so then why? I have a hunch that many advertisers will simply switch-off the Search partners. Could this be the first step towards the end of the Search partners?<br>
<br>
<b>Frustrated:</b> When will we be able to block specific domains for the Search partners? Why can we do this for the content network, but not the Search partners?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=93322">Why do I have separate account statistics for Google, search partners, and the content network?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e094</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:25:21 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New version of AdWords Editor - version 6.5</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Version 6.5 of AdWords Editor is now available, and includes a number of new features:<br>
<br>
<b>Keyword Opportunities</b> - apparently a tool for generating new keywords. I get an error when I try to use it so can't comment.<br>
<br>
<b>Data View Improvements</b> - column auto-sizing, column selection and an oddly basic date selection tool.<br>
<br>
<b>Importing and exporting </b>- no significant changes aside from the names of each option!<br>
<br>
<b>New editing options</b> - copy campaign or ad group "shells", in other words the campaign or ad group without the items. How odd.<br>
<br>
In short, a few minor cosmetic fixes, a few low-key tools, and one potentially interesting feature that won't work.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/support/adwordseditor/bin/static.py?page=release_notes.html" target="_blank">AdWords Editor release notes</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e093</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:01:35 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Statistics drop-down menu</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Some of the accounts I'm handling have a new mini-feature on the Campaign Summary page.<br>
<br>
Towards the top right of the data is a drop down menu next to Statistics, with four options: <br>
<br>
All (Search + Content)<br>
Search<br>
Content<br>
Summary<br>
<br>
It's not exactly useless, but we're not exactly breaking out the champagne either.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=93322&ctx=tltp" target="_blank">Why do I have separate 'Campaign Summary' page statistics for the search and for the content network?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e092</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:58:23 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quality Score &quot;Improvements&quot;</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[More changes afoot for Quality Score.<br>
<br>
From Inside AdWords (edited for relevance):<br>
<br>
<i>"We'd like to let you know of further improvements [to quality score] that we'll introduce in the coming weeks:<br>
<br>
    * Quality Score will now be more accurate because it will be calculated at the time of each search query<br>
    * Keywords will no longer be marked 'inactive for search'<br>
    * 'First page bid' will replace 'minimum bid' in your account"</i><br>
<br>
Interesting. Let's take a look at these three improvements individually.<br>
<br>
<i>Quality Score will be calculated at the time of each search query</i>:<br>
<br>
According to Google, "we are replacing our static per-keyword Quality Scores with a system that will evaluate an ad's quality each time it matches a search query". This sounds more like refining the existing system, as opposed to actively expanding or enhancing it.<br>
<br>
<i>Keywords will no longer be marked 'inactive for search'</i>:<br>
<br>
Not good news for advertisers. Firstly this takes yet another piece of information away from the advertiser. And as we know, information is money.<br>
<br>
Secondly, instead of knowing that there's a problem to be fixed, advertisers will just see their traffic dry up.<br>
<br>
<i>'First page bid' will replace 'minimum bid' in your account</i>:<br>
<br>
At first glance, this actually sounded quite good. Again, however, there are a number of problems.<br>
<br>
Firstly this takes yet another piece of information away from the advertiser. And as we know, information is money. Anyone seeing a pattern here?<br>
<br>
Secondly, all this can really do is raise the minimum bids. So what will most inexperienced, gullible or clueless advertisers do? They'll simply raise their bids to be on the first page. And what will that do to the minimum bid? Hint; It'll go up.<br>
<br>
You have to tip your hat to Google. If "dressing-up bad news as great news" was an Olympic event, they'd take Bronze, Silver and Gold every time.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/08/quality-score-improvements.html" target="_blank">Quality Score Improvements</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e091</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:00:07 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google AdWords Cheat Sheet</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Hi all,<br>
<br>
At last month's <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.sic.org/" target="_blank">Software Industry Conference</a> we gave all attendees a printed Google AdWords Cheat-Sheet in their goodies bag, that apparently went down very well.<br>
<br>
We're now making it available for download (as a PDF) from our website.<br>
<br>
I hope you find it useful. <br>
<br>
Enjoy:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/cheat-sheet/index.asp">Google AdWords Cheat Sheet</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e090</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:02:46 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google + DoubleClick = better content network</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[From Inside AdWords:<br>
<br>
"We're happy to announce that we'll soon be enabling a number of new features made possible by a new DoubleClick ad serving cookie on our content network. All advertisers will soon be able to take advantage of features like frequency capping, better reach and frequency reporting, and view-through conversions."<br>
<br>
On Google's official blog, the hype goes further:<br>
<br>
"When we purchased DoubleClick, we talked about how we would empower agencies, advertisers and publishers to collaborate more efficiently and effectively, and provide a better experience for our users. We are happy that we have been able to deliver on this promise already..."<br>
<br>
So what's it all about?<br>
<br>
The four main enhancements are:<br>
<br>
<b>Frequency capping</b> - allows advertisers to limit how many times a user sees an ad. Good for advertisers, good for users.<br>
<br>
<b>Frequency reporting</b> - gives advertisers "an insight" (aka some information but not all) into how many people have seen an ad campaign and an ad. Good for advertisers, but there are potential privacy issues for users.<br>
<br>
<b>Improved ads quality</b> - not sure what this means yet.<br>
<br>
<b>View-through conversions</b> - allows advertisers to see how many users visit their sites after seeing an ad. Not sure how this will work.<br>
<br>
The whole thing is being applied through use of a DoubleClick cookie. And users will be able to opt-out of this with a single click.<br>
<br>
The bottom line is that there will <u>probably </u>be greater transparency. My guess is that this is in response to a decline in confidence in the content network. Time will tell.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-features-coming-to-google-content.html">New features coming to the Google content network</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e089</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:37:28 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More Sponsored Links</title>
            <description>When I search a term in Google, then click &lt;b&gt;More Sponsored Links&lt;/b&gt; at the bottom of the ads, I&apos;m now seeing a new layout for the &quot;other&quot; ads.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What&apos;s odd is that I can&apos;t work out a correlation between the ads shown in a regular search, and the ads shown in the &lt;b&gt;More Sponsored Links&lt;/b&gt;?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the other hand it&apos;s Friday and I haven&apos;t had a coffee yet.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e088</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:39:36 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>(Ad)Word of the Day: Keyword Insertion</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[There's an interesting post on the <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com" target="_blank">Inside AdWords</a> blog on the issue of keyword insertion, often referred to as dynamic keyword insertion:<br>
<br>
"Keyword insertion is a powerful feature that can save you time and also help make your ad text more relevant. This feature will automatically customize your ad to a user's query, which means your ad is more likely to attract a user's attention."<br>
<br>
It's interesting that they're drawing attention to what used to be an unofficial technique. And it's even more interesting that they don't mention the main drawback of using keyword insertion.<br>
<br>
Namely that it can take away control of your ads, and can even result in some odd looking ads.<br>
<br>
A simple example:<br>
<br>
You're bidding on the keywords <b>raw conversion software</b> and <b>raw files</b>.<br>
<br>
Your ad is setup as follows:<br>
<br>
Convert RAW Files<br>
Download {KeyWord:RAW File Converter}<br>
for your PC. Free trial.<br>
www.domain.com<br>
<br>
This may result in the following:<br>
<br>
Convert RAW Files<br>
Download raw files<br>
for your PC. Free trial.<br>
www.domain.com<br>
<br>
And that's before getting into the issues of expanded matching.<br>
<br>
Dynamic insertions can be very useful, but use with caution!<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/07/adword-of-day-keyword-insertion.html" target="_blank">(Ad)Word of the Day: Keyword Insertion</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e087</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:49:34 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Format for Main Ad Group Page</title>
            <description>Some slight changes have been made to the look and format of the AdWords Web interface.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The main ad group page now breaks down ad group performance into Search (sub-divided into &quot;Google&quot; and &quot;Search partners&quot;) and Content (sub-divided into &quot;Placements you&apos;ve targeted&quot; and &quot;Other placements on the content network&quot;).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There is also now a &quot;Placements&quot; tab in the interface which allows advertisers to select placements to go along with their keyword targeted content campaigns.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e086</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:27:14 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New AdWords Editor Release - 6.0.1</title>
            <description>The new version of AdWords Editor makes it possible to download performance statistics for selected campaigns and ad groups, instead of having to download statistics for the entire account.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A very sensible change that should save advertisers a lot of wasted time waiting for statistics to download.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now if only I could still work on AdWords Editor in the background while it downloads data.  One can always dream!</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e085</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:26:34 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Use Keywords and Placements together on the Content Network</title>
            <description>Google now allows advertisers to combine the use of keywords and site placements in contextually targeted campaigns.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is a nice feature because instead of creating two separate campaigns, one for keywords and another for placements, you can now add both to any campaign running on the content network.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m hopeful this new addition will improve the targeting for content network campaigns.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e084</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:35:29 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Keyword research with figures</title>
            <description>Google&apos;s Keyword Tool is now displaying actual figures for the approximate search volume, instead of the old-style &quot;little green frustration bars&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is long overdue, and makes their free tool a serious contender to the likes of WordTracker and KeywordDiscovery.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A very welcome move.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e083</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:50:52 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Slow Speed Costs!</title>
            <description>It&apos;s now official. As of today, landing page load time will be factored into your keywords&apos; quality scores.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Meaning? Slower-loading landing pages may get lower quality scores, possibly resulting in higher minimum bids.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One more factor to keep an eye on.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/06/landing-page-load-time-now-affects.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Landing page load time now affects keywords&apos; Quality Scores&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e082</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:13:02 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Editor Bugs</title>
            <description>Eesh. I&apos;m running into some bugs with the latest version.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mainly:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- The cursor keys sometimes stop working when editing text. Oops.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- Very slow performance when uploading alterations.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- Some ad modifications wouldn&apos;t upload for me. I had to copy and paste the problem ads.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Based on what I&apos;ve seen so far, I&apos;d recommending waiting for version 6.0.1.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e081</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:10:03 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New version of AdWords Editor</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Version 6.0.0 of AdWords Editor has just been released.<br>
<br>
A lot of minor changes, but nothing revolutionary.<br>
<br>
<b>Useful:</b><br>
<br>
Spell checking - basic but effective.<br>
<br>
Drag and drop for ad groups.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/support/adwordseditor/bin/answer.py?answer=94246" target="_blank">Formula words in the Replace Text tool</a>.<br>
<br>
A better duplicate keyword finder.<br>
<br>
Better advanced searching.<br>
<br>
Backups automatically created when re-downloading an account.<br>
<br>
<b>Not so useful:</b><br>
<br>
A new tab structure. Mainly resulting in less space. Great.<br>
<br>
Appending text before or after existing text. For the life of me I can't work out why this would be useful.<br>
<br>
<b>Notably absent:</b><br>
<br>
Full access to campaign settings. You still need to log in via your browser to change (for example) ad display settings.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/support/adwordseditor/bin/static.py?page=release_notes.html&hl=en" target="_blank">AdWords Editor 6.0.0 Release Notes</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e080</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:29:30 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New feature - monthly budget</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA["New! You can now use both daily and monthly budget options for your campaigns.<br>
<br>
We are currently testing a monthly budget option with a limited number of advertisers. When you edit an existing campaign or create a new campaign, both 'daily' and 'monthly' will appear as budget options for your campaign settings." <br>
<br>
This one struck me as a little odd. Why would time and effort be spent on this?<br>
<br>
Do Google think that advertisers are incapable of converting a monthly budget to a daily one?<br>
<br>
One possible cynical interpretation:<br>
<br>
Google are dipping their toes in. If enough people use it and like it, I suspect this would become the standard option, and Google might even replace the existing daily option.<br>
<br>
Why is this a bad thing? Because it would be one more example of Google taking away control from their advertisers.<br>
<br>
Bear in mind that Google already make it quite clear that a daily budget doesn't actually mean a daily budget:<br>
<br>
"On any single day, the AdWords system may deliver up to 20% more ads than your daily budget calls for. This helps make up for other days in which your daily budget is not reached."<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=86920&hl=en_US" target="_blank">What is a monthly budget and how does it work?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e079</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:19:40 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>My Change History REALLY changes</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The <b>My Change History</b> is often overlooked, but is an extremely useful tool. The problem is that many users feel a little overwhelmed by the sheer amount of data presented.<br>
<br>
Google have now added graphical data to the top of the details.<br>
<br>
You can choose to display a graph of impressions, clicks, clickthrough rate, cost and conversions, and different points of the chart are graphically linked to the changes that took place.<br>
<br>
It's actually quite a nice idea, although I'm concerned that this much information may still overwhelm many users.<br>
<br>
At the very least though, it's a good reminder that making too many changes at the same time can result in drowning in data.<br>
<br>
Ultimately, however, I still prefer <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.adwordsreporter.com/" target="_blank">AdwordsReporter</a> to get to grips with what's going on in an account.<br>
<br>
Note: You may sometimes see an error when trying to generate the charts. I assume that this is an early glitch in the system.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e078</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:41:22 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>My Change History Changes</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Nothing overly dramatic here, but useful nonetheless.<br>
<br>
If you go to <b><i>My Change History</b></i> in <b><i>Tools</b></i>, you may (or may not) notice that the <b><i>going back</b></i> drop-down has more options than before:<br>
<br>
1 week<br>
2 weeks<br>
1 month<br>
3 months<br>
6 months<br>
2 years<br>
<br>
The change log can sometimes be very useful, yet most people don't even know it exists.<br>
<br>
It's well worth a few minutes getting to know this tool.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e077</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:13:25 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google Leaks Quality Score Variables</title>
            <description>Fascinating.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From the Search Engine Journal:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Earlier this morning a colleague of mine was conducting a search and called me over to show me something interesting. Immediately below each of the sponsored search results (AdWords) were three separate variable names and values.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-leaks-quality-score-variables-pscore-mcpc-and-thresh-in-search-results/6801/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Google Leaks Quality Score Variables (Pscore, mCPC and thresh) in Search Results&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e076</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:10:49 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New conversion tracking features</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[From the horse's mouth:<br>
<br>
"We've recently redesigned our conversion tracking feature in order to allow you to manage your ads more easily in a variety of different ways.<br>
<br>
As part of this redesign, you'll notice that you can now name and describe the types of conversions that you wish to have tracked by defining actions. You can classify each action as one of 5 separate types: Purchase, Lead, Sign-up, Page View and Other."<br>
<br>
I'm yet to experiment with the new features, but suspect that my fundamental issues with the system have not been addressed.<br>
<br>
(1) Why only a 30 day cookie? Not ideal if you're selling a 30 day trial of software.<br>
<br>
But more importantly:<br>
<br>
(2) Google knowing more about your business and industry is not to your advantage.<br>
<br>
Andrew Goodman, in his excellent "Winning results with Google AdWords" book puts it nicely:<br>
<br>
"<i>... using Google's tracking tool is like handing over your sales receipts to your office building landlord. This is information they don't need to know.</i>"<br>
<br>
Sigh.<br>
<br>
Too many people just don't get this.<br>
<br>
And don't get me started on Google Analytics!<br>
<br>
Not ideal.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=90165" target="_blank">Conversion tracking looks different. What changed and why?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e075</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:07:14 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Trademark Policy Revision (UK and Ireland)</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Straight from (one of) the horse's mouth:<br>
<br>
"<b>What's changing in AdWords Trademark Policy? When?</b><br>
<br>
Google has made a policy revision that applies to complaints we receive regarding trademarks in the UK and Ireland. For complaints received on or after Friday, April 4, 2008, we will no longer review a term corresponding to the trademarked term as a keyword trigger. However, we will continue to perform a limited courtesy investigation of complaints regarding ad text purported to be in violation of a trademark.<br>
<br>
Beginning May 5, 2008, keywords that were disabled as a result of a trademark investigation will no longer be restricted in the UK and Ireland."<br>
<br>
Now you know.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=92877&hl=en_US" target="_blank">AdWords Trademark Policy Revision (UK and Ireland) </a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e074</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:35:14 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An update to display URL policy</title>
            <description>Don&apos;t forget that the new display URL policy is set to be applied on Tuesday April 1st. I suspect it&apos;s not a joke.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;In response to advertiser and user feedback, and in an effort to provide more relevant advertising results and a higher quality experience for our users, we have made the decision to no longer allow certain exceptions with regards to our display URL policy. This includes, but is not limited to redirects and vanity URLs. This policy will be strictly enforced regardless of past approvals and will apply to all advertisers, beginning on April 1st.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
More details on the Inside AdWords blog:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/02/update-to-display-url-policy.html&quot;&gt;An update to display URL policy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e073</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:11:31 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>You were warned (AKA I told you so)</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://blog.revenuewire.com/">PPC Super Affiliate Blog</a> has an interesting article on the Google AdWords & Analytics "data sharing" program:<br>
<br>
"<i>So Adwords wants you to OK them accessing your Analytics data. Time to put on your Big-G tin foil hats.</i>"<br>
<br>
And the guys behind the blog hit the nail squarely on the head:<br>
<br>
"<i>Google must laugh out loud when they hear Yahoo and Microsoft talk about "Behavioral Targeting" in advertising. There is no cookie-trail in existence that could possibly give you the amount of 'behavioral' data Google now has.<br>
<br>
The 'do not share data' link may be the only way affiliates can put a stake in the ground and keep a fair amount of separation given the value of all of this data.<br>
<br>
Then again, what's the point of opting out? They're clearly already collecting it all anyway:</i>"<br>
<br>
"<b>Will my historical data be included?</b><br>
<br>
<i>When you opt in to data sharing, we will include data from up to a month before your opt-in date to enable features such as benchmarking. When you opt out, data sharing stops on that day.</i>"<br>
<br>
Ah.<br>
<br>
Anyone who feels that Google don't or won't use the data collected in their analytics may want to drink some water and lie down. Fast.<br>
<br>
And anyone who thinks that Google have the same goals as their advertisers may wish to do the same too.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://blog.revenuewire.com/?p=207">Worlds Are Colliding- Google Adwords & Analytics 'Data Sharing' Program</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e072</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:41:02 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Time really is money</title>
            <description>There&apos;s a new metric that is now supposed to affect quality score; the amount of time it takes for your landing page to load.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The main points appear to be:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(1) There&apos;s little idea of a good load time. I assume that common sense applies. Five seconds is fine. Thirty might not be. Two minutes definitely won&apos;t be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(2) You won&apos;t gain by having a fast loading page, but you can lose with a slow page.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e071</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:16:55 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An update to display URL policy</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Inside AdWords have posted that they're updating their display URL policy:<br>
<br>
"In response to advertiser and user feedback, and in an effort to provide more relevant advertising results and a higher quality experience for our users, we have made the decision to no longer allow certain exceptions with regards to our display URL policy. This includes, but is not limited to redirects and vanity URLs. This policy will be strictly enforced regardless of past approvals and will apply to all advertisers, beginning on April 1st."<br>
<br>
This seems to have created a certain amount of confusion.<br>
<br>
The bottom line is that the policy is the same. But in the past they sometimes made exceptions. Now they won't do so.<br>
<br>
This won't affect most AdWords account holders, but if Google made an exception for you in the past, you have until April 1st to conform to the rules.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/02/update-to-display-url-policy.html">An update to display URL policy</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e070</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:11:11 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Phishing Email</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Apparently there's a fairly sophisticated phishing email doing the rounds. It looks like the real thing but of course isn't.<br>
<br>
There are only a handful of reports so far, but you don't want one to be one of the unlucky few.<br>
<br>
The email appears to be a standard "disapproved ads" email, with a link to log in to your account.<br>
<br>
Be extra vigilant about clicking links from any such emails.<br>
<br>
The best approach, as always, is to log directly into your account.<br>
<br>
Better still have SoftwarePromotions handle your AdWords account, then you don't have to do anything!<br>
<br>
Let's be careful out there!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e069</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:04:17 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Keyword Tool redesign</title>
            <description>The Google AdWords Keyword Tool has been updated.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It appears to be &lt;b&gt;mainly &lt;/b&gt;a cosmetic redesign, but is still quite useful. Nothing to get too excited about though.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e068</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:39:27 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Template Centre</title>
            <description>What is the Template Centre?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;The AdWords Template Centre is a free tool that allows My Client Centre (MCC) account managers to create AdWords templates for pre-defined campaigns and share them with their directly-linked accounts. The advertisers with access to these templates can use them create their own campaigns.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
More to the point - Where is the Template Centre?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So far it&apos;s not showing up in my account. Why do they do this?</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e067</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:46:06 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Country targeting new interface</title>
            <description>If you go into a campaign&apos;s settings and choose to edit the locations, you may be in for a surprise.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Google have gone cool. But perhaps a little too cool.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The new interface appears to make use of Google Maps, but there&apos;s a problem.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It crashes my browser, and I know it does the same to at least one other system.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For example when I click the Browse tab my browser crashes. At least sometimes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
cool + crash = beta = uncool.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e066</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:21:19 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Change to content network text ads</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[It looks as though Google are tightening the content network again:<br>
<br>
"We're pleased to announce a change that we've made to the incidence of clicks on text ads on the Google content network. Previously, users could click anywhere on text ads running on the content network, including the ad's background and any part of the ad text, for their click to be registered. Now only clicks on the title or URL of text ads will be counted."<br>
<br>
With regular AdWords ads, Google's interests are split three ways: Their own, their advertisers, and the people searching.<br>
<br>
On the content network the people searching don't apply, but there are still three sets of interests to reconcile: Their own, their advertisers and the site owners.<br>
<br>
Google's tightening of the belt can only mean one thing. Too many advertisers are losing faith in the content network.<br>
<br>
It'll be interesting to see whether this makes a difference.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/11/change-to-text-ads-on-content-network.html">A change to text ads on the content network</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e065</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:41:11 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I don&apos;t like the new keyword analysis tool</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The latest entry in <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/">Inside AdWords</a> describes the new keyword analysis page; the latest tool for diagnosing a keyword's quality score:<br>
<br>
<i>"The new Keyword Analysis page gives you a detailed breakdown of your keyword's Quality Score and how it might impact your ad's visibility. Specifically, you'll learn how keyword quality and landing page quality are performing and receive recommendations for improvement."</i><br>
<br>
The idea, in concept, is a nice one. The implementation, however, leaves a lot to be desired. Instead of useful information you're more likely to find hype, propaganda and hyperbole.<br>
<br>
As an example, I just went into one of our client's accounts, and ran the tool on the keyword that has generated the most impressions and clicks this past week, with 3,101 impressions, 104 clicks and a 3.35% CTR. <br>
<br>
The tool tells me the following "useful information":<br>
<br>
(1) <i>No ad is showing for keyword XXX.</i> Interesting. I'm not sure how I received 104 clicks this week.<br>
<br>
(2) <i>Reason: We are showing your ad only occasionally based on your budget.</i> Right. So I need to spend more. Good tool.<br>
<br>
(3) This test is based on the user's location, and not where the ads are actually displayed. Puzzling.<br>
<br>
(4) <i>Quality Score: Great.</i> Great.<br>
<br>
(5) <i>What should I do? Keep it up! Your keyword, ad text and landing page quality are high. Continue to track your keyword and ad, however, as performance data can change regularly.</i> Finally some good advice.<br>
<br>
My main problems with the new tool are (a) that there is too much of sales push, (b) that too much of the information is inaccurate, and (c) it continues to fuel the quality score myth.<br>
<br>
Quality score is the AdWords equivalent of the PageRank recipe:<br>
<br>
- take two or three items of truth<br>
- mix them in with many irrelevant factors<br>
- water down until the truth can no longer be recognised and/or identified<br>
- leave in the oven for onlookers to discuss, theorise and disect ad nauseam.<br>
<br>
Quality score is little more than common sense. Your time can be better spent.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/10/new-keyword-analysis-page-diagnose-your.html">New Keyword Analysis Page: diagnose your keyword's quality score</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e064</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:44:21 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>1 keyword(s) are currently inactive for search</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[This one is stupidly small, but it really niggles me.<br>
<br>
How many talented developers are there within the Google AdWords team?<br>
<br>
Yet no-one can add a tiny line of code that will change this message to:<br>
<br>
 1 keyword is currently inactive for search<br>
<br>
 2 keywords are currently inactive for search<br>
<br>
I'm not a programmer but even I can write this code.<br>
<br>
It's the little thing(s) that are/can be annoying.<br>
<br>
It may also be something to do with this being a no-caffeine day...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e063</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:58:34 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What&apos;s New in Google AdWords?</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[What's New? <br>
<br>
According to the <b>1 New Feature!</b> link at the top of my AdWords account, there are two recently added items:<br>
<br>
<i>Compare performance across two date ranges and/or metrics on Account Snapshot</i>:<br>
<br>
This is quite a nice little feature that I stumbled across a few days ago. Not particularly exciting though.<br>
<br>
And <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.adwordsreporter.com/">AdwordsReporter</a> puts it to shame.<br>
<br>
<i>Use the Conversion Optimiser to save time and minimise conversion costs</i>:<br>
<br>
This is a new(ish) feature that's still in beta, designed to manages your advertising costs around specific conversion goals.<br>
<br>
It's an interesting idea, but there are caveats - aren't there always?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=60150">What is the Conversion Optimiser?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e062</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:43:07 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Help me</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google appear to be getting proactive with trying to get their advertisers to part with more cash.<br>
<br>
I just logged into one of our client's accounts, and underneath some of the <i>Current Status</i> data for each campaign, there are links saying (for example) <b><i>Help me get 69% more traffic</b></i>.<br>
<br>
Being naturally curious, I clicked on one of the links, wondering if Google would tell me that some of my bids were too high, or suggesting other cost saving techniques. I'm generally more optimistic on Mondays.<br>
<br>
The only advice offered, however, was to raise the daily budgets.<br>
<br>
How inspired.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e061</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:14:48 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Keyword Insertion now official</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The AdWords Help Centre has just been updated with details of using dynamic keyword insertion.<br>
<br>
Subjects include:<br>
<br>
    * How do I use keyword insertion? (tutorial)<br>
    * What is keyword insertion?<br>
    * When and why should I use keyword insertion?<br>
    * How does keyword insertion work with broad-match keywords?<br>
    * Will using keyword insertion affect my keywords' Quality Scores?<br>
    * Why doesn't my keyword appear in my approved keyword insertion ad?<br>
    * Why was my keyword insertion ad disapproved?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/topic.py?topic=12396">Using Keyword Insertion</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e060</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:24:18 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Landing page quality score clarification</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google's Inside AdWords has been discussing "websites that may merit a low landing page quality score.<br>
<br>
They've outlined three categories of websites that <b><i>will be penalised</b></i>; no beating around the bush here:<br>
<br>
(1) Data collection sites offering free gifts, subscription services etc., in order to collect private information<br>
(2) Arbitrage sites designed solely for the purpose of showing ads<br>
(3) Malware sites that knowingly or unknowingly install software on a visitor's computer<br>
<br>
They even go so far as saying that <b>if</b> complaints are received about ads for these types of sites, the advertisers <b>may </b>not be allowed to continue running AdWords ads.<br>
<br>
The entry also outlines types of sites that are likely to merit low landing page quality scores and may be difficult to advertise affordably:<br>
<br>
(a) eBook sites that show frequent ads <br>
(b) 'Get rich quick' sites<br>
(c) Comparison shopping sites<br>
(d) Travel aggregators<br>
(e) Affiliates not complying with their affiliate guidelines<br>
<br>
So what's going on here?<br>
<br>
Google are tightening their belts a little.<br>
<br>
Why?<br>
<br>
The success of Google AdWords depends on three groups all getting what they're looking for. Advertisers, searchers and Google. If any one group isn't happy, the three-way symbiosis can fall apart.<br>
<br>
Will this affect you?<br>
<br>
If you're running legitimate websites selling legitimate products, probably not.<br>
<br>
If you're trying to make "easy money" then maybe.<br>
<br>
Keep in mind that Google haven't said they <b>will </b>close all these accounts. They've said they <b>might</b>. Considering the fact that Google obviously make money from these advertisers, how out of their way do you think they'll go to track them down?<br>
<br>
Sometimes it's easier to turn a blind eye to minor issues than include them in the terms of usage.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e059</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:40:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Speak to a specialist</title>
            <description>&lt;i&gt;Google Live Support allows you to receive immediate response to your questions via a free online chat session with a Google AdWords representative.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Ask a specialist via chat button will appear on AdWords Help Center pages when an AdWords Specialist is available. You may not see the button all of the time, but it will be displayed as soon as a specialist is free. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Very nice!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=17472&quot;&gt;Ask a Specialist via Chat&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e058</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:16:56 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Little Trouble in Big China</title>
            <description>I just changed a campaign setting for one of our clients, and changed the location targeting to target all countries instead of a select few.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I then noticed a new message that I had never seen before:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Due to advertising regulations and laws of the People&apos;s Republic of China, you may be asked to provide certificates and licenses if you are advertising certain categories of products in China.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://adwords.google.com/select/chinafaq.html&quot;&gt;Advertising in China&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e057</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:04:14 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Report Centre Changes</title>
            <description>The Report Centre has had a subtle cosmetic makeover.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s easier to read and makes use of grey shading. Er...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You can also choose how many rows to display, but don&apos;t expect the system to remember your preferences.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Aside from all the above, the reports I&apos;m generating recently seem to be a lot faster. Long may it continue.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e056</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:15:42 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pushing the sale too hard?</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Most of my client accounts are showing some variation of the following message:<br>
<br>
"<b>Campaign Budget Alert<br>
</b><br>
Your ads are not receiving 63% of their eligible impressions due to your current budget settings. Increasing your budget can maximise your ad exposure and help your ads receive more clicks."<br>
<br>
Thanks Google, but I'm already on top of this.<br>
<br>
And as if that wasn't enough, underneath <b>Active</b> by each campaign's status, there's a link saying <i>Want more clicks?<br>
</i><br>
No, I don't. Thank-you.<br>
<br>
It's irritating. <br>
<br>
Have you ever been to a website site that has BUY NOW buttons plastered all over every page?<br>
<br>
It's irritating.<br>
<br>
I'm a little irritable today.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e055</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:25:41 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Top ad placement formula</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[There's an intriguing posting on the Inside AdWords blog. <br>
<br>
A stripped down version of the post:<br>
<br>
<i>"Advertisers often aim for top placement because they find that their ads perform the best when they appear above Google search results. <br>
<br>
Quality Score is the greatest determining factor in top ad placement, which means no one will ever be able to pay their way to the top.<br>
<br>
We have, however, been working on an improvement to the top ad placement formula.<br>
<br>
Today's formula considers an ad's Quality Score and actual cost-per-click (CPC). The improved formula will still heavily weight Quality Score, but instead of actual CPC, it will consider an ad's maximum CPC."</i><br>
<br>
I've read this a few times and don't get it.<br>
<br>
Essentially:<br>
<br>
Actual cost per click = amount advertiser is paying. Advertiser has some control over this.<br>
<br>
Maximum cost per click = amount advertiser is prepared to pay. Advertiser has full control over this.<br>
<br>
Unless I'm missing something, this is a very definite move towards letting advertisers pay their way to the top.<br>
<br>
Brawn will win over brain. At least until their budgets run out, anyway.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=72975&topic=12271">How is the formula for top ad placement changing?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e054</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:22:27 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pushing features onto AdWords Editor</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Are Google trying to push people into using their AdWords Editor software?<br>
<br>
I just logged into an account's Tools, and saw the following message:<br>
<br>
"The 'Copy or Move Keywords and Ad Text' and 'Advanced Search and Editing' tools will be removed from all AdWords accounts on August 20th, 2007. These features are still available in Adwords Editor, which you can  download for free."<br>
<br>
It's an interesting direction to take. But when will Google allow you to carry out all changes from within AdWords Editor?<br>
<br>
The decision is apparently as a result of user feedback. <br>
<br>
While I applaud the sentiment, I can't help but feel a little cynical.<br>
<br>
Are users really contacting Google to tell them which features they don't need under tools?<br>
<br>
<i>Dear Google:<br>
<br>
I really like the tools within my AdWords account.<br>
<br>
But why do you still have the 'Copy or Move Keywords and Ad Text' and 'Advanced Search and Editing'  tools?<br>
<br>
It's much easier in AdWords Editor you know?</i>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e053</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:51:40 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New version of AdWords Editor</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I've just installed version 4.0 of AdWords Editor.<br>
<br>
The information on the website doesn't tell me what's new, but here are a few things I've just discovered:<br>
<br>
(1) You can now set <b>custom date ranges</b>. Great! I'm genuinely delighted by this, as it allows me to look at 28 days of data at a time. You know the whole "units of 7 days" rule right?<br>
<br>
(2) More <b>structured menus</b>, and better use of <b>shortcut keys</b>. Very good.<br>
<br>
(3) The ability to only <b>publish a single campaign</b>. Not sure why that would be useful, but it could be.<br>
<br>
(4) It's a lot <b>faster and more responsive</b>.<br>
<br>
I'm sure there's more, but here in the UK it's 17:50 on a Friday.<br>
<br>
Oh and don't worry if you can't yet upgrade. It appears they may be staggering the rollout.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e052</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:40:23 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Campaign Optimizer?</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/">Inside AdWords</a> are reporting the launch of a new ad performance tool - <a href="https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=52944&topic=10092?ctx=awblog&sourceid=awo&subid=us-et-awb-073007_1">Campaign Optimizer</a>.<br>
<br>
I can't yet see it in any of our client accounts, but suspect that it'll appear over the next few days.<br>
<br>
<i>What is it?</i><br>
<br>
"It's an on-demand AdWords tool that provides personalized campaign ideas in just minutes. We're always looking for ways to help you improve your account performance and increase your advertising return, and we're excited that this tool can help jumpstart your optimization efforts."<br>
<br>
<i>Am I excited?</i><br>
<br>
No. I'm guessing that this will not be revolutionary.<br>
<br>
<i>Would I trust it?</i><br>
<br>
No. Even without having seen it.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e051</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:27:29 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Broad Match just became a lot more dangerous</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Recent log analysis for one of our clients revealed a very serious issue within their AdWords account that we assumed had been an error within the AdWords system.<br>
<br>
We contacted Google, and it turned out the system is working as intended. In the following information, keywords have been changed so as to protect client confidentiality, but <b>if you use broad match in your AdWords account/s, you want to read this</b>.<br>
<br>
When poring through the server logs, we noticed a lot of clicks for one single broad term. The problem was that we weren't bidding on it.<br>
<br>
The term generated 3,500 impressions and 140 clicks for the broad matched term climbing.<br>
<br>
These were the keywords that we were bidding on:<br>
<br>
climbing advice<br>
climbing assistance<br>
climbing classes<br>
climbing guidance<br>
climbing questions<br>
"climbing advice"<br>
"climbing assistance"<br>
"climbing classes"<br>
"climbing guidance"<br>
[climbing advice]<br>
[climbing assistance]<br>
[climbing classes]<br>
[climbing guidance]<br>
[climbing guide]<br>
<br>
<br>
Bidding on terms such as climbing advice and climbing assistance is not the same as bidding on the broad match climbing. The company in question don't sell books, magazines, equipment, courses or any number of possible broad match variations.<br>
<br>
When we sent this information to Google, they replied:<br>
<br>
"<b><i>I checked with our Technical Team regarding the issue we spoke about. It is possible for two-word keywords to expand to one-word keywords if that one word is highly relevant. In the example that we discussed, 'climbing' had a four percent clickthrough rate (CTR). This high CTR is telling our system that users searching on 'climbing' are still finding your ad to be very relevant. As you know, if you would not like to show on these expanded variations, you can use negative exact match.</b></i>"<br>
<br>
This concerns me. Aside from the terrible English.<br>
<br>
First of all, when does expanding a two-word keyword reduce it to one single word? Expanding means less?<br>
<br>
Secondly, why have they now placed the onus on their advertisers to find negatives for broad matches that they're not even bidding on?<br>
<br>
Thirdly, why are Google now deciding when to ignore certain words within your broad matches, and reduce them to single words?<br>
<br>
Fourthly, why are Google doing this so silently? If we hadn't spotted this in our logs, we'd never have known.<br>
<br>
This scares the bijeebies out of me.<br>
<br>
Moral: It's never been so important to thoroughly analyse your web logs.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e050</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:19:44 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Search Query Report</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[If you didn't yet spot it, there's a new report.<br>
<br>
The <b><i>Search Query Report</b></i> is one of a whole bunch of recently added features, but this one is different. It's really, really useful.<br>
<br>
"A Search Query Performance report shows performance data for the search queries that triggered the ads which appeared after receiving clicks. This report is only available for the search network."<br>
<br>
As per usual with all new features, there do appear to be inconsistencies, but this strikes me as a seriously useful source of quality information.<br>
<br>
Credit where it's due, this is one of the most interesting and useful additions I've seen in years.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=68034&topic=11441">What is a Search Query Performance report? How do I create one?</a><br>
<br>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e049</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:09:16 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IP address exclusion</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Another new addition that falls under the "bafflingly bewildering" category, Google recently added the ability to specify IP addresses where you do not want your ads to appear.<br>
<br>
Their information explains how it works, but I am thoroughly confused as to why this should be an option:<br>
<br>
"<b><i>You can exclude up to 20 IP addresses or ranges of addresses, per campaign.</b></i>"<br>
<br>
Why only 20?<br>
<br>
This strikes me as a very odd feature, and while Google explain how to use it, they fail to say why.<br>
<br>
If a person keeps clicking on your ads, shouldn't the Google system spot this as potential click fraud?<br>
<br>
And how many fraudsters will use fixed IP addresses?<br>
<br>
This is a dangerous tool. And it will only be a matter of time before someone goes through their web logs, sees "click fraud attempts" and inadvertently blocks every AOL user in the US from seeing their ads.<br>
<br>
Why have they done it?<br>
<br>
The only reason that I can think of is to alleviate the support requests. But as a feature, it's more or less useless.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e048</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:01:18 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Negative Keyword Tool</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google AdWords have added a lot of new features in the past week or so.<br>
<br>
One of them, the <b><i>Negative Keyword Tool</b></i>, may or may not be showing up in your <b><i>Tools </b></i>just yet.<br>
<br>
I've had a look at what it offers, and am more than a little puzzled.<br>
<br>
First of all when it comes to keyword information, the AdWords approach is usually to simplify to a baffling level.<br>
<br>
The keyword tool doesn't give actual figures for search volumes, for example, but gives meters indicating very low, low, average, high or very high. Why?<br>
<br>
Yet the the <b><i>Negative Keyword Tool</b></i> gives actual figures in the form of percentages.<br>
<br>
Secondly, the information they provide seems to be so incredibly inaccurate as to be useless.<br>
<br>
We ran the tool on a client's campaign that generates almost 3.5 million impressions per week with a very healthy number of keywords and clicks.<br>
<br>
The tool made two negative keyword suggestions, both of which were ludicrous.<br>
<br>
After a quick look at some of the other campaigns, it soon became clear that as it stands right now, the tool is more or less a waste of time.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e047</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:43:50 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sorting by budget</title>
            <description>You may have noticed that in the &lt;i&gt;Campaign Summary&lt;/i&gt; view, your campaigns are sorted by current budget in ascending order.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You may also have noticed that no matter what you do, this setting keeps reapplying itself.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Rest assured. You&apos;re not losing your marbles.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe it&apos;s a new feature?</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e046</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:01:08 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Work faster. Save money.</title>
            <description>After a series of unbelievably frustrating technical issues with my MCC account, I finally moved over to viewing my Ad Group information in tabs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Since doing so, I&apos;ve stumbled across a means of reducing the wait for your ad group info to display.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
When you click on an ad group, you&apos;ll probably notice that the information is sometimes a little slow to come in. Sometimes the three tabs (Summary, Keywords and Ad Variations) come in first, and it can take a few more seconds for the information to be displayed. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you see this, try clicking on the Summary tab. Nine times out of ten the data will immediately appear, saving you a few seconds each time.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I know it&apos;s not much, but I&apos;m a believer in the idea that if you look after your seconds, your minutes will look after themselves. Something like that anyway.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e045</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:18:26 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Q: When is a new feature not a new feature?</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A: When Google say that it is.<br>
<br>
The initial idea behind this feed was that Google didn't have a "what's new" area, to allow their customers to see ongoing changes to the system and interface.<br>
<br>
On May 9th I mentioned that Google had finally added this to their system, but was concerned that they weren't including new features at all.<br>
<br>
Time has proven me correct.<br>
<br>
Today's <b><i>New Feature</b></i> is the Account Snapshot. This was implemented weeks ago. <br>
<br>
The previous <b><i>New Feature</b></i> was the ability to pause ads and keywords, which was added on Feb 19th.<br>
<br>
For now, the best means of knowing what's new is to continue to read this feed. Watch this space.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e044</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:24:35 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>No End Date</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[If you log into your Campaign Settings, you should see a new option under <b><i>Basic Settings</b></i>; <b><i>No end date</b></i>.<br>
<br>
Google's take:<br>
<br>
"'No end date' is an extra campaign setting option that we have added to all AdWords campaigns.<br>
<br>
Advertisers now have two choices: set a specific end date when their campaign will stop running or select 'no end date' to have their campaign run indefinitely. Campaigns set to 'no end date' do not have to run forever; they simply run until the advertiser decides to pause or delete the campaign manually or resets the campaign to a specific end date. You can make those changes at any time. If you want to create a campaign and let it run until you decide to make changes, 'no end date' is a good choice.<br>
<br>
With the addition of the 'no end date' option, we will also change the default end dates for all AdWords campaigns. Until early in 2007, if an advertiser set no specific end date for a campaign, the AdWords system set a default end date of 31 December 2010. Now, if an advertiser creates a new campaign and sets no specific end date, the campaign will automatically be set to 'no end date'. "<br>
<br>
So far I'm not seeing the auto-setting kick in, but they did refer to doing so in the future tense. <br>
<br>
And obviously there's no way of choosing this option with AdWords Editor yet. It would be asking too much for Google to update their own software.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e043</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:34:02 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Placement Performance</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google are testing a new report type called the Placement Performance report.<br>
<br>
The idea is that advertisers can view performance metrics for ads that may be running on URLs or domains within our content network.<br>
<br>
Content network?<br>
<br>
From the horse's mouth:<br>
<br>
"Google has always provided full online statistical, conversion and financial reporting for the Google AdWords programme. Now with the Placement Performance report, you can gain greater transparency about your campaigns' performance on the content network for the first time. This report is intended as a tool for you to make informed decisions on improving your campaign's return on investment."<br>
<br>
Interesting.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://adwords.google.co.uk/support/bin/answer.py?answer=52924">How do I create a Placement Performance report?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e042</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:11:24 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What&apos;s New?</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I just logged into my Google AdWords account and saw a new link at the top right of the screen:<br>
<br>
<b>2 New Features!</b><br>
<br>
Clicking on the link let me see some recently added features.<br>
<br>
This is a long overdue addition, but they're <u>still</u> not including everything!<br>
<br>
The only way to see all the interesting new features and changes is still right here.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e041</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 9 May 2007 10:39:57 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New version of AdWords Editor</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Version 3.5 of the AdWords Editor has been released.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/adwordseditor/releasenotes.html">AdWords Editor 3.5</a><br>
<br>
New features include:<br>
<br>
- image ads compatibility (long overdue) *<br>
<br>
- drag and drop (they've finally caught up with Windows 95)<br>
<br>
- region and city targeting<br>
<br>
Nothing too exciting, but another move in the right direction.<br>
<br>
* Could this be a sign of Google's growing interest in image ads?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e040</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2007 09:58:23 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>SMS Phone Alerts</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[AdWords phone alerts let you receive important alerts about your account as text messages on your mobile phone.<br>
<br>
This strikes me as an interesting insight into Google's communication problems, as email would appear to be far more practical.<br>
<br>
Notifications will include payment and billing problems, ad activity and performance issues and more.<br>
<br>
Just what you need when you're lying on a beach on vacation.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=41010">About Phone Alerts</a><br>
<br>
It's a shame they can't extend the full functionality to My Client Centre accounts, but such is life with Google AdWords.<br>
<br>
As to where to find the new feature, go to <b><i>My Account</b></i>, <b><i>Account Preferences</b></i>, then <b><i>Notification Preferences</b></i>.<br>
<br>
In theory there should be a link to <b><i>Set up phone alerts</b></i>.<br>
<br>
And don't worry if it's not there. Google often seem to stagger new features across AdWords accounts. It should show up within a day or two.<br>
<br>
Something to look forward to...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e039</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:43:26 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google AdWords New Preferred Cost Option</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Just when you thought you were getting the hand of managing your Google AdWords account.<br>
<br>
"<i>Today, we are introducing a new bidding option called preferred cost bidding -- a feature designed to help you save time while achieving your advertising cost goals more consistently. Instead of setting a maximum cost-per-click (CPC) or cost-per-impression (CPM) bid, you can set a preferred CPC or CPM bid that represents the average price you want to pay.</i>"<br>
<br>
So what's it all about?<br>
<br>
On December the 18th, 2006, I wrote an entry entitled <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e024">Quality Score Befuddlement</a>.<br>
<br>
I outlined my belief that the AdWords system uses Quality Score in the same way that soldiers use smoke. To create confusion and take away the ability to assess what's going on.<br>
<br>
It's my belief that this latest "feature" is little more than a lot of smoke.<br>
<br>
Take a step back. The basic principle of AdWords is simple. Set a bid, be ranked according to performance and bid, pay when clicked.<br>
<br>
With time Google have developed the basic idea into a phenomenally powerful machine. Yet with each new feature, the system becomes ever more complicated.<br>
<br>
There are three types of features:<br>
<br>
<b>The good:</b><br>
<br>
Network choices, matching options, geographic and language targeting, maximum bids and more.<br>
<br>
These are genuinely useful, and help the advertisers achieve their goals.<br>
<br>
<b>The bad:</b><br>
<br>
Position preferences, ad serving that offers "more evenly" instead of evenly, content bids, budget optimiser, preferred cost bidding and more.<br>
<br>
These are overly complicated, and instead of aiding the advertiser, actually confuse them and take away vital information. In other words more smoke.<br>
<br>
<b>The ugly:</b><br>
<br>
Ad scheduling, accelerated delivery, preferred cost bidding and more.<br>
<br>
These are interesting features, but poorly implemented and overly confusing. And when there's confusion by the advertiser, who do you think gains the most; Google or the advertiser?<br>
<br>
The more observant readers will note that the new Preferred Cost Bidding appears under both <b>bad </b>and <b>ugly</b>.<br>
<br>
Why? Because I'm not yet sure just how bad and ugly it is. But I'm absolutely certain it won't be good.<br>
<br>
Google have an incredible and highly profitable system. But there are plenty of areas that could and should be improved. Yet for reasons that I unfortunately do understand, they keep squirting ever-thicker smoke over the ever-murkier waters. <br>
<br>
When I get the chance I'll experiment with preferred cost bidding in our test account. But I wouldn't dream of doing with any of our client accounts.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e038</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:47:41 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Campaign Summary changes</title>
            <description>If you log in to your AdWords account today, you&apos;ll probably see a &quot;&lt;b&gt;Cleaner look, more data.&lt;/b&gt;&quot; notice.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is odd. For the life of me I can&apos;t understand why they&apos;re drawing attention to what appears to be the most inconsequential change they&apos;ve ever implemented. Very strange.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nothing to get excited about.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e037</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:33:23 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>My Change History changes</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<b><i>My Change History</b></i> is a very useful feature that remains hidden away under the <b><i>Tools</b></i> tab.<br>
<br>
You now have more control over the date range, and can also select the <b><i>change type</b></i> as required.<br>
<br>
I suspect that this is more for Google's bandwidth and system performance than anything else, but it's still quite useful.<br>
<br>
They are also displaying a little more information under <b><i>Description,</b></i> assuming that you select the <b><i>Show all details</b></i> option.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e036</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:30:46 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Top ads display changes</title>
            <description>In case you haven&apos;t already noticed, the ads that are displayed above the natural search results are now displayed differently.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The blue background has been changed to yellow. And the link itself now needs to be clicked, instead of anywhere in the box.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m guessing that this will make a difference to the click through rates of these ads.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Measuring this, however, will be next to impossible. Advertisers won&apos;t be able to tell how many times their ads were displayed in this &quot;premium&quot; position, if at all.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e035</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:23:04 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords slow performance</title>
            <description>If you&apos;re grinding your teeth over how slow and unresponsive your AdWords account interface has been over the last 24 hours or so, you&apos;re not alone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We&apos;re seeing the same things in the UK and US. It appears that the deeper you dig, the slower the web interface.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And unlike most previous slowdowns, accessing your account/s through another country (eg: Ireland) makes no difference.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Hopefully Google will fix this quickly.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e034</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:24:20 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Shiny new help icons</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I've recently noticed the little help icons that have started showing up throughout the AdWords accounts. If you hover your mouse over them, some information is displayed.<br>
<br>
Useful?<br>
<br>
Most of them are more than a little basic, to put it mildly.<br>
<br>
And some of them are less than helpful.<br>
<br>
Example: the info displayed next to the inactive keyword notification tells you nothing, but does offer links to more information.<br>
<br>
Earth shattering? No. But it appears that Google are polishing and refining their <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/">help centre</a>, which is enormously useful.<br>
<br>
Anything that gives AdWords account holders more useful information has to be a good thing.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e033</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:27:34 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Promotional Credits policy</title>
            <description>As of March 31st 2007, AdWords promotional credits will only be available to Qualified Individuals and Qualified Companies in the Google Advertising Professionals Program.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why? According to Google, it&apos;s to &quot;ensure that customer acquisition funds are being spent appropriately&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Okay.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My guess? Too many people are taking advantage of promotional credits, and setting up &quot;what do we have to lose&quot; accounts. I can only imagine how relevant and worthwhile most of these prove to be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My theory? Google may have been a little too generous in giving these out. I&apos;ve seen companies giving them out with new website accounts.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Not any more.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e032</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:33:18 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Version of AdWords Editor</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Version 3.0 of AdWords Editor has just been released.<br>
<br>
<b>What's new:</b><br>
<br>
- the ability to pause keywords<br>
- full support for site targeted campaigns<br>
- negative sites<br>
- the ability to edit another account while your changes post (how useful is that?)<br>
- counting of rows selected<br>
- more detail in the "post completed" information<br>
<br>
<b>What's updated:<br>
</b><br>
- HTML export<br>
- CSV export<br>
- the ability to paste into multiple ad groups<br>
<br>
<b>What's not included:</b><br>
<br>
- full control over campaign settings<br>
- use of Google's own match syntax<br>
- end date bug (not as far as I can see)<br>
<br>
I don't understand why Google continue to take such an odd approach with this software.<br>
<br>
90% of it is superb. The other 10% is confusingly awful.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e031</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:30:08 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Report Changes (minor)</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google have been quietly making minor changes to some of the reports that you can generate from the Report Centre.<br>
<br>
Changes include changing some of the default settings for the various report types, and adding some new minor options. For example, within the <b><i>Ad Performance</b></i> report, there are more flexible options under <b><i>Filter Your Results</b></i>.<br>
<br>
Earth shattering? No. But interesting nonetheless.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e030</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:49:34 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pausing enabled</title>
            <description>Finally!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You can now pause ads and keywords from within your AdWords account.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Fantastic. I just hope they add the functionality to AdWords Editor soon.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e029</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:12:19 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quality Score Chaos</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[As expected, the first set of changes applied by the Quality Score update are causing a lot of problems for a lot of people.<br>
<br>
If you're seeing a whole load of inactive keywords with stupid/silly bids required to activate the keywords, then wait.<br>
<br>
All may not be lost yet.<br>
<br>
A number of people seem to think that at least some of the changes are down to technical problems.<br>
<br>
So hold your horses.<br>
<br>
As in all things AdWords related, throwing money at the problem may not be the best solution.<br>
<br>
Watch this space.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e028</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:48:20 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quality Score - the confusion continues</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Inside AdWords has issued a statement on upcoming changes to the way that Quality Score is handled and displayed.<br>
<br>
<b><i>"Transparency - Later this week, we're releasing an optional Quality Score column that shows the minimum bid for all of the keywords within an ad group as well as a Great, OK, or Poor quality label for your keyword."</b></i><br>
<br>
I have issues with this system.<br>
<br>
First of all, I still believe that Google use Quality Score like armies use smoke. See the <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e024">previous post</a> if you don't know what I'm talking about.<br>
<br>
Second of all, Google love figures.<br>
<br>
Search for "software marketing" and you'll be told there are 416,000,000 results.<br>
<br>
Yet go into your AdWords account and it all goes a little vague.<br>
<br>
Use the Keyword Tool to search for the same term, choose to display search volume, and there are no figures. Just little bars that represent very low, low, average, high and very high.<br>
<br>
And the soon to be released Quality Score information will be represented by Great, OK or Poor.<br>
<br>
Great. I mean Poor.<br>
<br>
Inside AdWords also announced that they're launching improvements to to the Quality Score algorithm.<br>
<br>
Improvements?<br>
<br>
<b><i>"As a result of this update, you may notice that the minimum bids increase for some of your keywords and decrease for others."</b></i><br>
<br>
Oh, one of those improvements.<br>
<br>
I remember how pleased people were by the last round of improvements.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/02/quality-score-updates.html">Quality Score updates</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e027</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:27:54 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Customised (customized) columns</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[You can now customise the columns that appear throughout your AdWords account.<br>
<br>
When I initially heard about this, I thought it might be useful.<br>
<br>
How naive of me.<br>
<br>
Aside from one fairly redundant option that can be added (average CPM), it appears that all you can do is <b>hide</b> the columns.<br>
<br>
Why on earth would you want to do that??<br>
<br>
Perhaps your CTR is depressingly low? Or you've decided that the average position is irrelevant?<br>
<br>
Yet again I'm staggered.<br>
<br>
Google must have some serious talent behind the system, and there are hundreds of useful features being asked for by users. So why do they only add little irrelevant features that nobody wants?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e026</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:03:38 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ad Serving</title>
            <description>In the campaign settings, under Advanced Options, you can choose how ads are served.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is it just me, or has the wording changed? I seem to remember that one of the options used to be to display ads equally. Now it says &quot;Show ads &lt;b&gt;more &lt;/b&gt;evenly&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
More evenly? I&apos;m not sure whether this is a mistake on my part, irrelevant, or a little more Google AdWords deviousness.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e025</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:52:34 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quality Score Befuddlement</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[What is 'Quality Score' and how is it calculated?<br>
<br>
If you believe what Google tell you, then they've just released the formula. In a manner of speaking:<br>
<br>
<i>Quality Score = (keyword's CTR, ad text relevance, keyword relevance, landing page relevance)</i><br>
<br>
Right.<br>
<br>
That's a formula?<br>
<br>
When soldiers fight in close quarters, they often use smoke grenades. The idea of the smoke isn't so much to hide what they're doing as to create confusion and take away the ability to assess what's going on. With enough smoke, the enemy can't see how many people there are, what they're doing, what they've carrying or even which direction they're going.<br>
<br>
Facts become blurred. Knowledge becomes guesswork. Even the sharpest of eyes start to squint.<br>
<br>
It's difficult to respond when you can't see.<br>
<br>
Quality Score is Google's smoke screen.<br>
<br>
We know how AdWords works, and we know about the importance of Quality Score. But the more information that Google give us, the more confusion they create.<br>
<br>
It's ingenious.<br>
<br>
I've often thought that the AdWords quality score is similar in effect to PageRank. Everyone talks about it, no-one understands it, and too many people become far too obsessed by it. Don't let Quality Score dominate your Google AdWords efforts.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=10215&topic=9354"&gt;What is Quality Score and how is it calculated?</a> (hint: don't hold your breath)]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e024</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:00:02 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google Audio Ads</title>
            <description>AdWords is moving onto (into?) the radio.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Google Audio Ads is an extension of the AdWords platform, allowing advertisers to create and manage radio advertising campaigns using AdWords&apos; powerful online interface.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=53850&amp;topic=9324&quot;&gt;What is Audio Ads?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e023</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:31:01 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Editor 2.5</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A new version of <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/intl/en/adwordseditor/index.html">AdWords Editor</a> has been made available.<br>
<br>
I have to admit to being puzzled. Like most other releases, it includes a variety of different <b>nice </b>features. But they still don't include the <b>important </b>features that users are requesting.<br>
<br>
There's better implementation of keyboard shortcuts, tools for bulk deletion, exporting to HTML (?) and automatically adding http:// to your destination URL (hurrah) and more.<br>
<br>
But can you change all of the campaign setting from with the editor? No.<br>
<br>
Can you now always see all of your ad text displayed? No.<br>
<br>
Does Google AdWords Editor now use Google's own formatting for matching? No. No!<br>
<br>
So is it only a small step? Not even.<br>
<br>
Why are Google spending time on fixing silly little issues and adding unwanted features instead of addressing the core issues that users of the software point out and request?<br>
<br>
Are they short on manpower?<br>
<br>
In balance, however, if you're not already using AdWords Editor, it's still a very useful tool. Once you've figured out all the workarounds anyway.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/intl/en/adwordseditor/releasenotes.html">AdWords Editor Release Notes</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e022</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:33:46 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Yo-Yo</title>
            <description>Google AdWords has up and down like a yo-yo this morning.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It keeps slowing down to a crawl, then giving an error message, then going offline completely.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sigh.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e021</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:03:28 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MCC statistics now updated daily</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A notice in my Google AdWords MCC account:<br>
<br>
"<b>Fresh stats!</b>  Your MCC dashboard statistics are now updated every morning, based on your local time zone setting."<br>
<br>
Wouldn't you think that Google would be able to handle more regular updates?<br>
<br>
Dig around a little, and you'll also find the following:<br>
<br>
"MCC alerts for declined payment and 'budget at 80%' are updated on your dashboard within two hours of their occurrence."<br>
<br>
My experience: Not so.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?https://adwords.google.co.uk/support/bin/answer.py?answer=27569&hl=en_GB"&gt;How often are my MCC statistics and alerts updated?</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e020</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:25:52 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quality Score Nonsense</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I sometimes wonder what Google AdWords are thinking.<br>
<br>
From InsideAdwords, a fascinating snippet of information:<br>
<br>
"Using Website Optimizer to experiment with your landing page does not have any impact on your Quality Score or your landing page quality. Website Optimizer evaluates your conversion rates to tell you which marketing messages are converting most often on your landing page, whereas the Quality Score doesn't incorporate any conversion information."<br>
<br>
Right. I had to read that a few times too.<br>
<br>
So quality has nothing to do with conversion.<br>
<br>
I think this may be the beginning of a new chapter for Google.<br>
<br>
If anyone from Google is reading this then I think it's time to start listening to your advertisers.<br>
<br>
You're going too far. You're annoying and frustrating too many people.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2006/11/answering-your-landing-page-quality.html" target="_blank">Answering your landing page quality questions (part 1)</a><br>
<br>
<br>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e019</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:43:25 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Landing Page Quality Update</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.blogspot.com/2006/11/landing-page-quality-update.html">Inside AdWords Blog</a> has posted details of some forthcoming changes to landing page quality.<br>
<br>
Credit where it's due, Google are having an impact on the English language. Not only is Google now a verb, but <b>quality </b>is slowly but surely becoming synonymous with <b>confusion</b>. <br>
<br>
From the blog entry:<br>
<br>
"Why are you focusing on landing page quality?<br>
<br>
The goal of our ongoing landing page quality initiative is to improve the experience of our users by providing high quality results not only in the ad text, but also once the user has clicked through to the site. We strongly believe that an excellent experience on the advertiser's site is an essential element in earning the continued trust of our users. Clearly, the better the user experience, the more likely it is that users (who are also your potential customers) will continue to seek out -- and click on -- AdWords ads over the long term. This is to the advantage of everyone: users, advertisers, and Google alike."<br>
<br>
Never forget that Google are balancing the needs of three groups:<br>
<br>
(1) Advertisers. Google have to remember why their advertisers use AdWords. Run too many circles around them and they walk away.<br>
<br>
(2) Searchers. If the quality of Google's search results becomes diluted, people will begin to look elsewhere.<br>
<br>
(3) AdSense. If the account holders don't get enough for the space they give up, they'll look for other options.<br>
<br>
You may notice a pattern here.<br>
<br>
Relevance = Revenue.<br>
<br>
That's all there is to it.<br>
<br>
Keep your landing pages (important hint coming here) and the rest of your website <b>relevant </b>to your ads and keywords. That's all there is to it.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e018</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 9 Nov 2006 08:14:04 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Editor Nightmare</title>
            <description>I&apos;ve been having terrible problems with AdWords Editor.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The problem has now been resolved, but it took far too long, should have been avoided in the first place, and I have lost a great deal of faith in AdWords Editor.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you use AdWords Editor, you want to read this.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://blog.SoftwarePromotions.com/index.php/adwords-editor-nightmare-2006-10-25/&quot;&gt;AdWords Editor Nightmare&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e017</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:11:01 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Report Centre Changes</title>
            <description>Report Centre Changes&lt;br&gt;
Very minor alterations appear to have been made to the Report Centre.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The first change is a cosmetic one. Instead of choosing the Report Type from a drop down menu, you have a list to choose from. Technology is a wonderful thing.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There&apos;s also a new Filter option under the optional Advanced Settings. Under most reports, this lets you separate Content from Search, which initially struck me as an interesting move.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Will it provide greater transparency for your content ads?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
No. I don&apos;t think so. But it&apos;s a great illusion.</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e016</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:38:50 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Editor Version 2.0</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The new version of Google AdWords Editor has just been released, and I'm in the process of giving it a workout.<br>
<br>
There are loads of new features, but these are the first things that I noticed.<br>
<br>
<b><u>IMPORTANT:</b></u> You may want to hold off with upgrade if you have work in progress in your older version. It appears that the new version has to re-download the data from your Google AdWords account. As far as I can see, this overwrites what you have.<br>
<br>
I just learnt this the hard way.<br>
<br>
What's new?<br>
<br>
The interface looks more or less identical, but does seem a little quicker than the old version, especially in accounts with lots of data. And unless I'm mistaken, it also seems to download data from Google AdWords faster too.<br>
<br>
There are some more tools, such as a duplicate keywords checker (very useful) and a tool to group keywords together that I really don't understand.<br>
<br>
When you choose to check changes, the dialog can provide more details of what's being checked, but not as much information as I would have expected.<br>
<br>
And my big issues with the last version of AdWords Editor?<br>
<br>
Does Google now recognise its own conventions? No! For example, if you want to enter three match variations of Google AdWords, you would expect to enter the following:<br>
<br>
google adwords<br>
"google adwords"<br>
[google adwords]<br>
<br>
But you'd be wrong. Sigh.<br>
<br>
And the campaign settings? Yes!! I can now change the max CPC for content separately. I'm very happy about that.<br>
<br>
There's also a feature to select "Advanced Max CPC Changes", which allows you to increase max CPC either by a percentage or a number of dollars. Intriguing. You can also choose to set max CPC value to no higher than X. I must check what max CPC stands for then.<br>
<br>
There are also some new features to find and replace text in ads. Useful, but they don't allow you to preview the changes. Bad idea. The same for some new Advanced URL Changes.<br>
<br>
My other peeve - do the ads fit in the ad preview? No.<br>
<br>
All in all, a big step in the right direction. Let's hope that more updates are on the way.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://services.google.com/adwordseditor/intl/en-GB/releasenotes.html">Google AdWords Editor Version 2.0 Release Notes</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e015</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:52:13 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Check your ads through the eyes of the world!</title>
            <description>If you want to see how your Google AdWords ads will appear to people in other parts of the world, Google have made the process a lot easier.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As well as providing you with a link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.google.com/adpreview&quot;&gt;preview the ad results&lt;/a&gt; (that won&apos;t affect your AdWords impressions, clicks etc.) the page details the parameters for country, region, city and more.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Very useful.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=44886?ctx=awblog&amp;hl=en&amp;ctx=rosetta&quot;&gt;How can I be sure my ad is showing in other geographical locations? &lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e014</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:19:03 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Free software that saves time - AdWords Editor</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google's AdWords Editor has been around for quite a while now, yet I'm surprised by how few people are actually using it.<br>
<br>
If you haven't yet dabbled, you may find the following to be useful.<br>
<br>
<b>Pros:</b><br>
<br>
- Fantastic at bulk copying/cutting and pasting of ads and keywords. Infinitely faster than the Google AdWords interface.<br>
<br>
- Great at chopping and changing between ad groups and campaigns to check keywords, ads, tracking etc.<br>
<br>
- Ideal for setting up new campaigns that you don't want to make live yet.<br>
<br>
- When making a large number of minor changes (eg changing the tracking for 25 ads), may sometimes save hours over the Google AdWords interface.<br>
<br>
<b>Cons:</b><br>
<br>
- It's still in beta. Yes I know that Google like to leave their software/services in beta for years, but the interface is quite clunky. And finding the specific setting you're looking for can sometimes be a challenge.<br>
<br>
- The interface needs some serious work. Google should use our <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/software_evaluation.asp">Software Evaluation Service</a>!<br>
<br>
- There are a few settings that you can't change from within the software, so you need to go into the Google AdWords account anyway.<br>
<br>
- The software doesn't recognise Google's own conventions. Surround a keyword by quotation marks and it doesn't realise it's supposed to be phrase matched. Sigh.<br>
<br>
Ultimately I feel the same way about Google AdWords Editor as I do about Act!2005. I use them both all day, and they are simultaneously the most useful and exasperating pieces of software on my system. Classic love-hate. <br>
<br>
But the bottom line is that Google AdWords Editor saves me a great deal of time every day of the week. Not bad for free software.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://services.google.com/adwordseditor/">AdWords Editor</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e013</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:04:14 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MCC Alerts</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I just logged into the Google AdWords My Client Centre, and found a notice from Google regarding MCC Alerts:<br>
<br>
"The MCC alerts feature makes it easy to keep informed about important issues that may affect your managed client accounts. Based on your preference settings, alerts will appear on your MCC dashboard about account-specific issues."<br>
<br>
The options that I can select, right now, are alerts for the following:<br>
<br>
Ad delivery stopped<br>
<br>
Google AdWords: Credit Card Declined<br>
<br>
Campaign end dates nearing<br>
<br>
Account budget end dates nearing<br>
<br>
Budget is 80% completed<br>
<br>
Earth shattering? No.<br>
<br>
Useful? Yes, very.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e012</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:43:29 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Report Centre Changes</title>
            <description>If you go to your account&apos;s Report Centre, and select &lt;b&gt;Ad Performance&lt;/b&gt; as the report type, you&apos;ll see that Google now let you specify which ad variations to include: text ads, image ads and/or local business ads.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Obviously this gives you more information, and information in Google AdWords is power.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But of all the changes that the Google AdWords development team could have included, this seems to be off the scale for obscurity.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Or is it?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Could it be that there&apos;s a growing trend towards image ads or local business ads working better?</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e011</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:03:24 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Click Fraud Detection</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google AdWords have long understood that <b>click fraud poses a more serious threat to Google than their advertisers</b>.<br>
<br>
Why?<br>
<br>
Because if we (the advertisers) suspect click fraud, we walk away from Google AdWords. A great shame, but not the end of the world.<br>
<br>
But if enough of us walk away at the same time, AdWords lose their customers. And Google AdWords is the heart of the Google money making machine.<br>
<br>
Market forces have, predictably, produced services to stamp down on this threat. Some of whom, according to Google, have widely exaggerated the scale of the problem.<br>
<br>
From Inside AdWords:<br>
<br>
"One clear indication that the consultants' results are flawed: they're not even getting the total number of clicks correct. We have seen some instances of reports showing 1.5 times the number of clicks in our logs - for example, in one case 1,278 clicks were claimed as being "fraudulent" by the consultant while only 850 actually even appeared as clicks in Google's logs."<br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2006/08/troubling-findings-on-how-some-third.html">Troubling findings on how some third parties detect click fraud</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/adwords/ReportonThird-PartyClickFraudAuditing.pdf">A more detailed PDF of the findings may be found here.</a><br>
<br>
Personally I've always found Google to be quite responsive when it comes to responding to click fraud. And infinitely better than Overture.<br>
<br>
And it's no coincidence that Google also recently introduced new features to track invalid clicks from within their reports. Details here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2006/07/estimating-invalid-clicks.html">Estimating invalid clicks</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e010</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More Changes - Quality Score revisited</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[In case you hadn't already heard, Google recently made some sweeping changes to the backbone of their "<b>Quality Score</b>" system.<br>
<br>
A lot of people logged into their Google accounts last week to find that a whole load of their lower bids were now inactive. Hmmm.<br>
<br>
Interestingly enough, the vast majority of our clients appear to have been completely unaffected. But the forums are full of some very unhappy people indeed.<br>
<br>
<b>Generally speaking</b>, the majority of people affected seem to be using a lot of very low-priced keywords.<br>
<br>
<b>Generally speaking</b>, ads pointing to one-page websites seem more likely to have been affected.<br>
<br>
The theory is that Google are trying to spot the pages and sites that don't have enough content, or at least "quality" content.<br>
<br>
If this is the case, then surely moving ads to sites that do have lots of content would work? Or for that matter simply adding content?<br>
<br>
The question is, if you do so, how long will it take Google to spot that you've realised the error of your ways?<br>
<br>
But the big question is as follows. Why have almost none of the companies that we work with been affected?<br>
<br>
<b>Do Google really love SoftwarePromotions?</b> Or is it something to do with how we have setup our client's campaigns?<br>
<br>
If so, then what are the key points to avoiding the latest Google Slam?<br>
<br>
One thing is for sure. There are a lot of really unhappy people out there who are now looking elsewhere to spend their money. If the trend continues, this will have obvious repercussions on Google.<br>
<br>
My advice: Don't panic. If you've fallen victim, contact Google AdWords or your account rep and find out what you need to get things moving again. Without spending more money. If account holders continue to walk away, Google are going to have to find a better way of raising the quality of their results.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e009</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:10:08 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Major Round of Changes</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The AdWords team have been busy, but I for one am not so happy.<br>
<br>
The interface has been redesigned quite drastically. If you go into one of your <b>Ad Groups</b>, you'll see that the account stats are now displayed in a tabbed interface.<br>
<br>
Does it work?<br>
<br>
I like that fact that you can now instantly see your conversion rates on individual keywords. That's a good new feature. But it's the only one.<br>
<br>
The ability to change the date range has been quite cleverly hidden. Go on. See if you can spot it. Hint: Instead of a nice clear drop down, it's now a little <b>Change range</b> link towards the top of the page. Hiding useful functionality doesn't rate as an improvement in my book.<br>
<br>
You can also override the tabs and choose to <b>View all tabs</b> at once. Which makes it even more difficult to read in my opinion. One step forward and three steps back?<br>
<br>
By default, when you create new ads, you won't see which keywords have been performing well. And this is progress?<br>
<br>
So why have they done this, and not implemented the features that advertisers have been asking for?<br>
<br>
There are a few possible reasons:<br>
<br>
(1) Because they genuinely believe that the new interface is better. Personally I don't believe this to be the case. They've already proved that they can create a good interface when they want to. This isn't one of them.<br>
<br>
(2) Because people were getting too comfortable with the old interface. Yes, I know it makes me sound like a conspiracy nut, but I think this may well be the case. For more on this, come and hear me talk at the <a href="http://sic.org/schedule.asp">Shareware Industry Conference</a>. I'm the guy wearing the aluminium hat.<br>
<br>
(3) Because Google like to change their system just after I finalise my Powerpoint Presentations for the Shareware Industry Conference. This is the third year on the run that they've done this to me.<br>
<br>
Yup, it has to be reason 3.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e008</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:04:53 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ad Scheduling</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I really like it when Google listen to their customers. Credit where it's due, this is a feature that many people have been asking for.<br>
<br>
Normally, assuming your budget is high enough, your Google AdWords ads run 24 hours a day, every day.<br>
<br>
The new scheduling features allow to you select the blocks of time and/or days of the week that you want the campaign to run, while the advanced features allow the price to be adjusted during certain times of the day.<br>
<br>
Interesting.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=33407" target="_blank">Step by step instructions</a> are available if required.<br>
<br>
Note that when you enable this feature in the <b>Campaign Settings</b>, you also need to select a permanent time zone for your account. The important word here is permanent.<br>
<br>
Question: Do you set the time zone according to your business or your web server? <br>
<br>
Answer: The obvious choice may appear to be the time zone of your business, but you might want to make sure that when (for example) you match up your AdWords data with your server logs, that you're looking at the same time sets.<br>
<br>
Details are available from <a href="https://adwords.google.co.uk/support/bin/answer.py?answer=32346&hl=en_GB" target="_blank"&gt;What is the time zone for my AdWords account?</a><br>
<br>
So how useful are the new scheduling features? That remains to be seen. I know a lot of people have requested this feature, but personally I can't see it being so useful for anyone selling their goods to the world. There are other requested features that I feel would be far more useful to far more people. For example the ability to pause an ad, without having to delete it.<br>
<br>
But Rome wasn't built in a day.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e007</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:25:28 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Position Preferences</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Inside <b>Edit Campaign Settings</b>, under <b>Advanced Options</b>, there's a checkbox that allows you to <b>Enable position preferences</b>.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://adwords.google.co.uk/support/bin/answer.py?answer=31788&hl=en_GB" target="_blank"&gt;Google's Help</a> explains:
<br>
"Position preference lets you notify Google where you would prefer your ad to show among all the AdWords ads on a given page. <br>
<br>
Whenever you run a keyword-targeted ad, your ad is assigned a position (or rank) based on your cost-per-click (CPC) bid, your keyword's Quality Score and other relevant factors. There may be dozens of positions available for a given keyword, spread over several pages of search results. <br>
<br>
If you find that your ad gets the best results when it is ranked (for example) third or fourth among all AdWords ads, you can set a position preference for those spots. AdWords will then try to show your ad whenever it is ranked third or fourth and avoid showing it when it is ranked higher or lower. If your ad is ranked higher than third for a given keyword, the system will automatically try to lower your bid to place your ad in your preferred position." <br>
<br>
We've now tried this with around ten different accounts.<br>
<br>
One account saw fantastic results.<br>
<br>
One saw mediocre results.<br>
<br>
And the others were all bad.<br>
<br>
My advice? Try it for a week and see. You never know. But it appears that the odds may be against you.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e006</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:18:35 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AdWords Editor</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Google's offline AdWords Editor Software is now freely available to everyone.<br>
<br>
And it's free.<br>
<br>
It is, however, still in BETA, but I'm expecting it to remain that way for quite some time.<br>
<br>
And the good news is that it works for users of the <b>My Client Centre Account</b> too. So <a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/gap.html" target="_blank">Qualified Google Advertising Professionals</a> (like myself) are happy!<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/linkto.asp?http://services.google.com/adwordseditor/" target="_blank">AdWords Editor</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e005</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:46:35 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Including deleted items that were active</title>
            <description>When you drill all the way down into an ad group, under the date selection section, there&apos;s a checkbox for the following:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Include deleted items that were active in this date range  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m not sure about this one. Was that there before?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If so, then how&apos;s that for a feature with limited appeal?</description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e004</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:27:23 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New terms - US accounts only?</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[New terms - US accounts only?<br>
<br>
You may have noticed the following message in your AdWords account:<br>
<br>
<b>Important notice: Please be advised that Google has modified the standard terms and conditions of the AdWords programme. As stated in the terms, your continued use of AdWords indicates that you accept these new Terms and Conditions. </b><br>
<br>
Oddly we're only seeing this in our US client accounts.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=37824" target="_blank">Summary of the changes</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://adwords.google.co.uk/select/TCUSbilling0406.html" target="_blank">Updated terms</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e003</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:05:09 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Delivery method - new feature</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Inside <b>Edit Campaign Settings</b>, under <b>Budget Options</b>, there are now two alternatives for <b>Delivery Method</b>:<br>
<br>
Standard: Show ads evenly over time <br>
<br>
Accelerated: Show ads as quickly as possible <br>
<br>
What's it all about? According to Google's explanation, accelerated delivery is "best if you want to increase the likelihood of spending your full budget each day. We will display your ads as often as possible until your budget is reached. If your budget is set below the system-recommended budget, your ads may not receive all possible impressions."<br>
<br>
Is there any real advantage to this? I really don't know. It could turn out to be useful, but it could also be one of their all too common red herrings.<br>
<br>
Anyone who's been working with Google AdWords for long enough knows that new features may fall into three categories. The useful, the detrimental and the irrelevant.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e002</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 09:08:47 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ad Serving - terminology change</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Inside <b>Edit Campaign Settings</b>, under the so-called <b>Advanced Options</b>, there are now two alternatives for <b>Ad Serving</b>:<br>
<br>
Optimise: Display better-performing ads more often <br>
<br>
Rotate: Show all ads equally<br>
<br>
You may well find that you've always left these on the default, which is to display the better performing ads more often. However this isn't always the best choice, especially if you're working with new ads and/or A-B testing.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.SoftwarePromotions.com/adwords/index.asp#e001</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 09:06:02 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
